Friday, February 3, 2017

Why Trust Holden?

Holden Caulfield is a very unique narrator.  As established in the famous first line, he speaks directly to the reader, and is aware of the that fact during his narration. He also tells us quite frankly, "I'm the most terrific liar you ever saw in your life."  This statement, in the context of his awareness of the act of narration, calls in to question his reliability as a narrator.  However, I do not think I'm alone in feeling like I can trust Holden as a narrator.  I think this is partially because of the way he speaks his mind to us all the time and certainly doesn't hold back with his criticism of others.  In addition to criticizing others, he is also fairly self-deprecating.
I was sixteen then, and I'm seventeen now, and sometimes I act like I'm about thirteen. It's really ironical, because I'm six foot two and a half and I have gray hair. I really do. The one side of my head—the right side—is full of millions of gray hairs. I've had them ever since I was a kid. And yet I still act sometimes like I was only about twelve. Everybody says that, especially my father. It's partly true, too, but it isn't all true. People always think something's all true. I don't give a damn, except that I get bored sometimes when people tell me to act my age.
As a teenager, admitting to acting like you're twelve is pretty significant, as we teenagers generally look down on younger kids and their behavior.  Holden also calls himself a moron repeatedly while discussing his flunking out of school (again).  I think Holden's self-deprecation is part of what makes him likable as a narrator and easy to believe.  Holden can be quite harsh in his criticism, for example when he first tells us about Ackley.
He was one of these very, very tall, round-shouldered guys—he was about six four— with lousy teeth. The whole time he roomed next to me, I never even once saw him brush his teeth. They always looked mossy and awful, and he damn near made you sick if you saw him in the dining room with his mouth full of mashed potatoes and peas or something. Besides that, he had a lot of pimples. Not just on his forehead or his chin, like most guys, but all over his whole face. And not only that, he had a terrible personality. He was also sort of a nasty guy. I wasn't too crazy about him, to tell you the truth.
Hearing all of Holden's thoughts almost makes one feel like a co-conspirator of sorts, getting all the dirt on the people in Holden's life.  Also, he is criticizing pretty much every character in the book including himself, but does not criticize the reader, which, I think, endears him somewhat to the reader.  When I think about it logically, I have very little reason to trust what Holden tells us, but his familiar voice and understandable tiredness with the world around him lure the reader in.  Do you trust Holden as a narrator?  Is there a specific reason you trust/mistrust Holden?  I have had trouble identifying any specific reason as to why I feel like I can trust Holden's narration, but for some reason I do.

7 comments:

  1. Yea I totally agree! He doesn't sugar-coat things -- one of the frankest (is that a word?) narrator's in the books that I've read so far (not that many lol). Co-conspirator; I totally agree! I used to only describe as being his buddy/cliche and whatnot, but I feel that you describe him better. His criticism definitely makes him more trustworthy, even more so during my period of life where colleges are sugar-coating every single damn thing about them. I mean seriously you think calling yourself "a world-class university" is gonna perk my interest? The hell does that even mean? I assure you that pushing your deadline back by two months isn't attractive AT ALL.

    Well anyways kudos to you Holden you're my favorite narrator!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you -- it's hard to articulate why I trust him, but I just do. I think the self deprecation is a really good point. He rags on the people around him, but if he really wanted us to like him and no one else, he wouldn't rag on himself do. Like, he might be like "I'm no so smart" but the way he talks about himself doesn't strike me as surface level self deprecation to MAKE us trust him, it seems genuine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you make a good point, if his self deprecation was staged in some way it would definitely not have the same effect. As it stands, I see Holden's self deprecation as a sign that he is, in fact, being honest with the narrator. If he only ragged on others and never said a negative word about himself, he would be just as phony as anyone else and far more hypocritical and untrustworthy.

      Delete
  3. I completely agree with you. I blindly trust Holden as a reader, even though he says he lies, even though he's very hypocritical. The casualness of his language makes me feel like I am in every situation with him, and he's very direct in his description of scenes. The honesty in his thoughts and descriptions lets us draw our own conclusions, giving us agency and making him more reliable in our eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that we totally trust Holden because we can relate to him and he is much more relaxed and nontraditional compared to the narrators in a lot of other books. A lot of the things he tells us, are things that we might think to ourselves without voicing it, but now we hear that from another person. Also, many books, including "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man," have more formal and complex narrative voices, so Holden Caulfield is a much-appreciated break from that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If Holden tell us he is a liar should we believe him or is that a lie too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point Matt, Salinger is certainly hinting at this classic paradox in this passage. If Holden is a liar, then he is lying when he tells us he is a liar, but that means he is telling the truth, which means he is a liar. This circular logic has no end.

      Delete